Small and power-efficient computers in the form of NUCs and Compute Sticks have emerged as bright spots in the PC market over the last few years. The Compute Stick form factor is the x86 version of the popular ARM-based HDMI sticks. The first-generation x86 Compute Stick came from Intel and used a Bay Trail-T SoC. At the 2016 CES, Intel introduced a Cherry Trail version, as well as two Skylake Core M-based models. We reviewed the Cherry Trail version back in January, and it is now time for one of the Core M versions to be subject to our mini-PC evaluation routine.

Introduction and Setup Impressions

The Intel Compute Stick we are reviewing today is the Core m3-6Y30 model (STK2M3W64CC) that comes with Windows 10 Home (64-bit) pre-installed, making it ready to roll right out of the box. The specifications of our Intel STK2M3W64CC review configuration are summarized in the table below.

Intel Core m3-6Y30 Compute Stick Specifications
Processor Intel Core m3-6Y30
Skylake x86, 2C/4T, 900 MHz (up to 2.2 GHz), 14nm, 4MB L2
4.5W TDP (cTDP up to 7W, cTDP down to 3.8W)
Memory 4GB LPDDR3
14-17-17-40 @ 1866 MHz
Graphics Intel HD Graphics 515
Disk Drive(s) Kingston eMMC M52564
(64 GB; eMMC 5.0-compatible)
Networking Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
(2x2 802.11ac - 866 Mbps)
Audio Capable of 5.1/7.1 digital output with HD audio bitstreaming (HDMI)
Miscellaneous I/O Ports 3x USB 3.0
1x micro-SDXC
Operating System Windows 10 Home x64
Pricing (As configured) $390
Full Specifications Intel STK2M3W64CC Specifications

The Core m3-6Y30 belongs to the Skylake Core M family. It is meant to target the fanless 2-in-1 market, but, in the Compute Stick, it is actively cooled.

The STK2M3W64CC comes with the OS pre-installed, but, it is suggested to update the drivers that ship with the system. Drivers and BIOS updates are available for download on Intel's website. In addition to the main unit, the other components of the package include a 21.44W (5.2V @ 2.2A Type-C + 2x 5V @ 0.9A USB 3.0 Type-A ports) adapter with a Type-C power delivery port that can also ferry data between the main unit and Type-A ports. The cable is more than 3ft in length. We also get a HDMI extender cable to help use the Compute Stick in recessed or otherwise inaccessible HDMI ports.

The gallery below presents a closer look at the chassis design of the Core m3-6Y30 Compute Stick and the packae contents.

We had a very difficult experience managing our previous mini-PC reviews with just 32 GB of eMMC storage and/or 32-bit versions of Windows pre-installed. Fortunately, the STK2M3W64CC comes with 64GB of eMMC and Windows 10 Home x64 pre-installed. We were able to set up the system with a 20GB internal partition after shrinking the partition on which the OS was installed.

The BIOS of the Core M Compute Stick has a lot of interesting features compared to the ones in the Atom-based units. One of the notable optons is the ability to completely turn off the fan. The default setting is to keep it off till needed, and speed it up based on the thermal load.

We also have a good deal of control over the behavior of the front LED from the BIOS. Bluetooth devices can be authorized in the BIOS to make them available even before the OS is up and running.

In the table below, we have an overview of the various systems that we are comparing the Intel Core m3-6Y30 Compute Stick against. Note that they may not belong to the same market segment. The relevant configuration details of the machines are provided so that readers have an understanding of why some benchmark numbers are skewed for or against the Intel Core m3-6Y30 Compute Stick when we come to those sections.

Comparative PC Configurations
Aspect Intel Core m3-6Y30 Compute Stick
CPU Intel Core m3-6Y30 Intel Core m3-6Y30
GPU Intel HD Graphics 515 Intel HD Graphics 515
14-17-17-40 @ 1866 MHz
14-17-17-40 @ 1866 MHz
Storage Kingston eMMC M52564
(64 GB; eMMC 5.0-compatible)
Kingston eMMC M52564
(64 GB; eMMC 5.0-compatible)
Wi-Fi Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
(2x2 802.11ac - 866 Mbps)
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
(2x2 802.11ac - 866 Mbps)
Price (in USD, when built) $390 $390
Performance Metrics - I
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Devo2007 - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    Hey, us phone guys are still waiting on the full Galaxy S7 review and the HTC 10.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    We should start a timer.
  • Jimster480 - Tuesday, July 5, 2016 - link

    I'd love a review on the HTC 10. Especially since I have had one for months now.
  • Cygni - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    You should ask for your money back. Oh wait.
  • abrowne1993 - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    Such a stupid argument every time I see it. If people stop coming to the site because of the lack of desired content, then the advertisers will stop paying.
  • Impulses - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    So only the content you care about matters? Or you're the high arbiter over what content attracts more readers? Everyone and their mom has a GTX 1080 review, honestly I don't see what we're missing without AT's besides maybe some architecture insights...

    At least those whining about the S7/HTC 10 have more of point, AT's smartphone content has always been pretty unique and much more in depth than anyone else's... And the smartphone upgrade cycle/churn is faster than GPU's (which are constantly sold out right now anyway).
  • abrowne1993 - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    I didn't make any mention of the content I wanted. I'm speaking for every unanswered complaint.
  • Cygni - Tuesday, June 28, 2016 - link

    And that would be AnandTech's problem, not yours. Nobody cares what articles you think they should or shouldn't produce to get advertisers.
  • ddriver - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    Instead of asking my money back I am simply not giving it. AT is not whitelisted in my ad blocker. And with the way it handles ads they are not simply hidden, they aren't loaded to begin with.
  • wolfemane - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    The adds on this site are getting way out of hand, Now the promoted stories bullahiat at the end of the article with no relevance to the site itself. Absolutely horrible. I can barely view the site on a mobile device anymore. Time to find an ad blocker for mobile? I need to find one.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now